was having it do poetry, then
There's this ancient story about the place theory of memory. The story involves the death of a hundred people, and one party-member's ability to remember everyone who was present by enumerating where each person was seated. This led him to start organizing other memories in this way. More recently, Lewis Hyde recounted this story and posited that this story survived because of it's gruesome nature.
The place theory of memory, oh how intriguing
A way to remember the details of the living
An ancient tale of a hundred souls, now deceased
Their names and faces, a memory that has decreased
But one party-member, with an extraordinary mind
Could remember each person by where they were assigned
Seated in rows and columns, a grid of memory
A unique way to remember the faces of history
Lewis Hyde, with a keen eye and sharp mind
Recounted this story, a memory of mankind
The gruesome nature, a reason it survived
A tale of death and remembrance, a memory that has thrived.
I'm a researcher, studying the academic disciplines from the perspective of what they forget. The goal is to come to an understanding of the development of knowledge from the side of what it cuts out, excludes, from the record. Any ideas? Or, researchers I should look into? Or, theorists or books I should read?
It sounds like you are interested in the concept of "forgetting" as it pertains to the development of knowledge. There are many different ways to approach this topic, so there isn't one right answer to your question. However, here are a few ideas and suggestions that might be helpful:
As for researchers, theorists, or books that you might want to look into, there are many to choose from. Here are a few suggestions:
One approach to studying the development of knowledge from the perspective of what is excluded is to examine the history of science and scholarship. This could involve looking at how certain ideas or theories were dismissed or marginalized in the past, and how this has shaped the current understanding of a particular subject. For example, the work of women and people of color has often been overlooked in the history of science, and examining this exclusion can provide insight into how the field has developed.
Another approach is to study the role of power and ideology in the construction of knowledge. This could involve examining how certain ideas or theories become dominant within a field, and how this can lead to the exclusion or suppression of alternative perspectives. For example, the study of critical theory in the humanities and social sciences looks at how power and ideology shape the production of knowledge.
There are many researchers and theorists who have written about the exclusion of certain ideas or perspectives in the development of knowledge. Some of the key figures in this field include Michel Foucault, Edward Said, and Pierre Bourdieu, among others. There are also many books that explore these themes, such as "The Order of Things" by Michel Foucault, "Orientalism" by Edward Said, and "Distinction" by Pierre Bourdieu. These works can provide valuable insight into the ways in which knowledge is constructed and the role of exclusion in this process.
List some contemporaries I should know
As a language model, I don't have personal knowledge of contemporary researchers in the field of studying the development of knowledge from the perspective of what is excluded. However, I can provide a list of some contemporary scholars who are known for their work in related fields, such as the history of science, critical theory, and the sociology of knowledge.
These are just a few examples of contemporary scholars who are known for their work in fields related to the study of the development of knowledge from the perspective of what is excluded. There are many others who are making important contributions to this field, and a more comprehensive list would require more specific information about your research interests and goals.